TGLP active in National Insurance Bill inquiry

TGLP is continuing to lead calls for the Government to reverse its decision to exclude London and the South East from a National Insurance holiday for new businesses, which will benefit firms across the rest of the UK, but not in the Thames Gateway.

TGLP provided a written submission to the Bill Committee, which met over a series of sessions in the first weeks of December and to discuss potential amendments.

As the Bill stands, new businesses will not have to pay the first £5,000 of Class 1 employer National Insurance contributions due in the first twelve months of employment for each of the first ten employees hired in their first year of business.  However, TGLP is asking Government to reconsider the exclusion of London and the South East from the ‘holiday’, and is concerned that it demonstrates a failure to understand the diversity of London and the South East’s economy.

Proposed amendments that would have seen the rules regarding regional exclusion changed were defeated at this stage, but Thames Gateway MPs pressed the Government representatives hard on the impact of excluding London and South East boroughs from the measure, and remain hopeful that a new approach to the targeting of the National Insurance ‘holiday’ will be considered.

Shadow Treasury Minister David Hanson MP, used the TGLP briefing to make the case for the proposed changes during the committees consideration of the Bill.

He told the committee:

“At a time of massive public spending cuts, very difficult challenges and real issues of regional development ahead of us. If those regions are excluded from the payment holiday, there is no opportunity for those deprived boroughs to access that scheme.

However, do not just listen to me—as ever, I am a bigoted Labour politician, I have my views, stood for election and opposed the Government, and this is me, speaking as a Labour politician. I have stretched the hand of friendship out to the Minister and said that we support the Bill, but do not just listen to me; look at the evidence that has been presented to the Committee. As paragraph 1 of the written evidence from the Thames Gateway London Partnership states:

“The Thames Gateway London Partnership (TGLP) believes that the National Insurance contributions holiday should be extended to cover London and the South East.”

It is the first thing that the TGLP said, and the evidence continues with this damning statement, which is the important part:

“A failure to do so demonstrates a lack of understanding about the diversity of the London Thames Gateway’s economy and the importance of the London Thames Gateway as the driver for the UK economy. The exclusion of London and the South East from the Bill is inconsistent with the intention”.

To read the full text of the Bill Committee session, click here (David Hanson’s contribution is on page 68).

The Evening Standard covered TGLP’s efforts to have the National Insurance holiday measures expanded to include the whole of the UK.  Click here to see the article on the Evening Standard website.

TGLP chair Lord Falconer on the future of the Thames Gateway: “The Treasury must lead”.

This content is from the TGLP archive

As we begin to adapt to a new parliament and Britain’s first coalition government since the Second World War, what should we be looking for in terms of government commitment to our major regeneration projects in the Thames Gateway?

I believe that the one thing we must look for is a continuing sense of focus, and that the way to provide this ios to move fast in these potentially turbulent political times to create strong and decisive leadership.

As the Thames Gateway London Partnership (TGLP) said in its recent prospectus Return on Capital, the Thames Gateway project has made its greatest advances when strong national leadership – from Michael Heseltine to John Prescott – has supported and encouraged local aspiration and enterprise. That is why we called for a senior government minister with authority and cross government responsibility for the Gateway to support local and regional government in East London.

The way in which we plan now for our future is a crucial factor in securing a sustained return to economic growth; it will not just happen, and we must make sure we do not miss opportunities, including investment opportunities as economic recovery takes places across the globe. The London Thames Gateway has rightly been regarded as a national priority, as the region best placed to support the nation’s growth as well as delivering the largest share of London’s growth. With the right commitment and leadership, it can continue to attract investment as we sell the value of the Thames Gateway to Britain and the rest of the world. And commitment and leadership are needed to ensure that important infrastructure projects such as Crossrail and High Speed Rail, which present opportunities to support the growth of the Thames Gateway in a way that will benefit the economy well into the future, proceed as planned.

In a competitive international market, a lack of leadership, which could be interpreted as a lack of commitment, may mean we lose out on potential investment opportunities. This is not just bad for East London; it is bad for the rest of Britain which depends on support from London’s wealth creation. This is an economic argument, and I believe that the strongest possible signal of commitment would be sent if the Treasury, through the Chancellor of the Exchequer, took responsibility for sponsorship of the Thames Gateway as a project of national economic significance and committed to knocking heads together across the whole of Whitehall in support of that objective.

We know this – strong leadership – has worked before and believe that it can work again. In a difficult economic climate the Treasury is best placed to provide leadership for this important project and enable government to act quickly and decisively to make sure that Britain does not miss out.

Lord Falconer,

Chair, Thames Gateway London Partnership

Click here to download this document